1. Abid, A, Farooqi, M, & Zou, J. (2021). Persistent anti-Muslim bias in large language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 298–306).
2. Alkhouri, K. I. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in the study of the psychology of religion. Religions, 15(3), 290. https: //doi.org.
3. Amershi, S, Weld, D, Vorvoreanu, M, Fourney, A, Nushi, B, Collisson, P, et al. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM.
4. Arias-Arévalo, P, Martín-López, B, & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2023). The role of power in leveraging the diverse values of nature for transformative change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 101352.
5. Ashraf, C. (2021). Exploring the impacts of artificial intelligence on freedom of religion or belief online. International Journal of Human Rights, 26(5), 757–791. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1968376
6. Bassam, S. (2023). The impacts of artificial intelligence on religious education. Retrieved from Din Online website (www.dinonline.com). [in persian]
7. Bakshy, E, Messing, S, & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
8. Binns, R, Veale, M, Van Kleek, M, & Shadbolt, N. (2018). It’s reducing a human being to a percentage: Perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘18). Association for Computing Machinery, Paper 377, 1–14.
9. Braun, M, Bleher, H, & Hummel, P. (2021). A leap of faith: Is there a formula for trustworthy AI? Hastings Center Report, 51(3), 17–22. https: //doi.org/10.1002/hast.1207
10. Brown, T. B, Mann, B, Ryder, N, Subbiah, M, Kaplan, J, Dhariwal, P, ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2005.14165.
11. Browne, R. (2024). The ethical implications of AI in global religions. Journal of Religious Ethics, 45(2), 245–260. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10712-024-93823-8
12. Buolamwini, J, & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 77–91). PMLR.
13. Chen, T, Kornblith, S, Norouzi, M, & Hinton, G. (2021). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1597–1607). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.05709
14. Chrostowski, M. (2024). Promoting critical thinking through the use of ChatGPT in religious education. Österreichisches Religionspädagogisches Forum, 32(2), 166–181. https: //doi.org/10.25364/10.32: 2024.2.10
15. Chrostowski, M, & Najda, A. J. (2025). ChatGPT as a modern tool for Bible teaching in confessional religious education: A German view. Journal of Religious Education, 73, 75–94. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40839-024-00244-1
16. Citlak, A. (2021). Psychology of religion in the theories and research of the Lvov-Warsaw school: Basic achievements and developments. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 43, 95–116.
17. Citlak, K. (2021). A computational approach to understanding religious texts using deep learning models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.
18. Devlin, J, Chang, M. W, Lee, K, & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1810.04805. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805
19. Floridi, L. (2020). Ethical challenges in artificial intelligence: Towards a comprehensive strategy. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 69, 117–139.
20. Floridi, L, Cowls, J, Beltrametti, M, Chatila, R, Chazerand, P, Dignum, V, ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
21. Harari, Y. N. (2023). Dataism and AI: How artificial intelligence shapes the future of religion. New Age Religion Journal, 5(3), 110–126.
22. Harari, Y. N. (2023). Will AI create a religion? Views of the algorithmic forms of the religious life in popular discourse. Project MUSE. https: //doi.org/10.1353/project.muse.2023
23. He, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and socioeconomic forces: Transforming the landscape of religion. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 602. https: //doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03137-8
24. Hernawati, S, Hafizh, M, & Rahardja, M. N. A. (2024). Adjusting the ideal Islamic religious education curriculum to the development of AI-based technology. Progresiva: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam, 13(1), 129–144.
25. Ho, M. T, & Mantello, P. (2023). An analytical framework for studying attitude towards emotional AI: The three-pronged approach. MethodsX, 10, 102149.
26. Ho, M. T, Mantello, P, & Vuong, Q. H. (2024). Emotional AI in education and toys: Investigating moral risk awareness in the acceptance of AI technologies from a cross-sectional survey of the Japanese population. Heliyon, 10(16). https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36251
27. Hoffman, D. (2023). Ethics of AI: Considerations in the field of religious practices. AI & Society, 32, 123–135.
28. Hoffman, R. R, Miller, T, Mueller, S. T, Klein, G, & Litman, D. J. (2020). Metrics for explainable AI: Challenges and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1812.04608. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.04608
29. Holstein, K, Wortman Vaughan, J, Daumé, H. III, Dudik, M, & Wallach, H. (2020). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). ACM. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376446
30. Jain, L. R, & Menon, V. (2023). AI algorithmic bias: Understanding its causes, ethical and social implications. In 2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI) (pp. 460–467).
31. Jin, X. (2018). Internet, artificial intelligence and new religion. World Religious Cult, 1, 82–87.
32. Liang, W. (2020). Believers’ network experience and the changing governance of authority: A summary of foreign and domestic studies on internet plus religion. World Religious Studies, 3, 183–188.
33. Lin, D. (2022). Characteristics and management of internet religious information from the perspective of digital technology. World Religious Culture, 6, 54–61.
34. Mantello, P, Ho, M. T, Nguyen, M. H, & Vuong, Q. H. (2023). Machines that feel: Behavioral determinants of attitude towards affect recognition technology—Upgrading technology acceptance theory with the mindsponge model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–16.
35. Muralidhar, D. (2021). Examining religion bias in AI text generators. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ‘21) (pp. 273–274). Association for Computing Machinery.
36. Nam, S. (2023). Implications for the direction of Christian education in the age of artificial intelligence. Christian Education Journal, 74, 107–134.
37. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
38. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. https: //doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479837243.001.0001
39. Pringle, T, & Smith, J. (2024). Algorithmic religious life: AI’s role in creating new spiritual practices. Journal of Technology and Religion, 3(1), 78–89.
40. Puzio, A. (2023). Robot, let us pray! Can and should robots have religious functions? An ethical exploration of religious robots. AI & Society, 1–17.
41. Rafiei Toroghi, F., Foladi, S., Fehresti-Asl, A., Ramezani, S., & Salehi-Kia, F. (2024). Aligning religious concepts with artificial intelligence technology: Contemporary approaches. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Modern Research in Education, Psychology, Jurisprudence, Law, and Social Sciences. Shirvan: Conference Secretariat. [in persian]
42. Radford, A, Wu, J, Amodei, D, & Clark, J. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8), 9.
43. Roll, I, & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0108-5
44. Salsabila, A. Z. A, & Rohiem, A. F. (2024). The ethical influence of artificial intelligence (AI) in religious education: Implications, challenges, and innovative perspectives on the Merdeka curriculum. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 3, 81–88.
45. Segun, S. T. (2021). Critically engaging the ethics of AI for a global audience. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(2), 99–105. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09570-y
46. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 1593–1606. https: //doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12842
47. Sianipar, D, & Telaumbanua, S. (2024). Implementation of Christian religious education learning by using the outcome-based education (OBE) approach in the era of artificial intelligence.
48. Smith, J. A, & Rahman, T. (2020). AI in religious studies: A critical evaluation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 69, 117–139. https: //doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11904
49. Thorne, J, Vlachos, A, Christodoulopoulos, C, & Mittal, A. (2018). FEVER: A large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol. 1 (Long Papers) (pp. 809–819). ACL.
50. Toevs, J. (2023). The role of AI in enhancing Christian education. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
51. Tsuria, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence’s understanding of religion: Investigating the moralistic approaches presented by generative artificial intelligence tools. Religions, 15(3), 375. https: //doi.org/10.3390/rel15030375
52. Varona, D, & Suárez, J. L. (2022). Discrimination, bias, fairness, and trustworthy AI. Applied Sciences, 12(12), 5826. https: //doi.org/10.3390/app12125826
53. Vaswani, A, Shazeer, N, Parmar, N, Uszkoreit, J, Jones, L, Gomez, A. N, ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
54. Veale, M, & Binns, R. (2017). Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717743530. https: //doi.org/10.1177/2053951717743530
55. Walters, H. (2023). Hindu and Buddhist perspectives on robot-assisted religious rituals. Journal of Eastern Religious Practices, 12(4), 345–360.
56. Williamson, B. (2016). Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and ‘learning to code’. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 39–58. https: //doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1160936
57. Zhang, J, Song, W, & Liu, Y. (2025). Cognitive bias in generative AI influences religious education. Scientific Reports, 15, 15720.
58. Zhou, M, Abhishek, V, Derdenger, T, Kim, J, & Srinivasan, K. (2024). Bias in generative AI. arXiv preprint. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2401.00000.
