Digital Islamic Humanities

Digital Islamic Humanities

Computational Analysis of Persian Texts with a Focus on Religious and Mystical Literature

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Payame Noor University
Abstract
With the remarkable growth of digital humanities in recent decades, new horizons have opened for the analysis of classical texts, particularly within Persian religious and mystical literature. This article aims to introduce contemporary theoretical approaches and analytical tools, highlighting the potential of digital literature to support Islamic and mystical studies. Unlike studies focusing on a specific corpus, this research seeks to present a range of specialized methods and software employed in leading global universities such as Stanford, Harvard, and MIT within the field of digital literary studies, explaining their capabilities for analyzing Persian texts. The theoretical framework of the article is grounded in concepts such as distant reading (Franco Moretti), corpus linguistics, topic modeling using the LDA algorithm, and statistical stylometry. Accordingly, software such as Voyant Tools, AntConc, MALLET, Gephi, and Word2Vec are introduced, with an examination of their application in analyzing explicit and implicit concepts, stylistic structures, and semantic patterns in Persian texts. The findings indicate that the development of technical infrastructure—including corpus-building platforms and text-mining tools—can create a systematic transformation in literary studies. Computational approaches, by minimizing individual biases, enable large-scale analysis, comparative studies of styles, and integration of statistical methods with rhetorical readings. Among the advantages of these methods are the discovery of hidden semantic patterns without imposing the researcher’s preconceptions, visualization of concepts, and the ability to analyze long and diverse texts. These tools also have extensive applications in interdisciplinary research, particularly at the intersection of literature, linguistics, and computer science. However, challenges remain, such as the need for clean, digitized corpora, difficulties in interpreting statistical outputs, the lack of semantic lexicons for classical Persian, and technical complexities in preprocessing Persian texts. Therefore, the article emphasizes the necessity of collaboration among specialists in literature, computational linguistics, and Islamic studies to advance this type of interdisciplinary research.
Keywords

 

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
Burrows, J. F. (2002). “Delta”: A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267–287.
Firoozi-Moghaddam, A. (2024). Investigating and understanding the functions of artificial intelligence in processing and analyzing Persian prose texts based on computational prose studies. 14th International Conference on Commemoration of Abolfazl Beyhaqi and Interdisciplinary Studies of Persian Prose, Iran. [in persian]
Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press.
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 55–60).
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.
Molavi, J. M. (1999). Kolliyat-e Shams ya Divan-e Kabir [The collected works of Shams or the Great Divan]. Edited and annotated by Badi‘ al-Zaman Foruzanfar. Tehran: Amirkabir. [in persian]
Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and literary study. University of Chicago Press.
Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press.