علوم اسلامی و انسانی دیجیتال

علوم اسلامی و انسانی دیجیتال

تحلیل کتابسنجی پژوهش‌های علوم انسانی دیجیتال در کتابخانه‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دکترای علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان؛
2 عضو هیئت علمی گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
علوم انسانی دیجیتال به‌عنوان رویکردی میان‌رشته‌ای، بسترهای نوینی را برای توسعه خدمات، سازمان‌دهی منابع و تولید دانش در کتابخانه‌ها فراهم کرده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی تولیدات علمی در تقاطع علوم انسانی دیجیتال و کتابخانه‌ها، به شناسایی روندهای پژوهشی، ساختار دانش و بازیگران کلیدی این حوزه می‌پردازد. روش پژوهش، کتاب‌سنجی است و داده‌ها از پایگاه اسکوپوس استخراج و پس از پالایش با نرم‌افزار  Bibliometrix تحلیل شده‌اند. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه مقالات منتشرشده در این حوزه تا زمان انجام پژوهش است. تحلیل کلیدواژه‌ها و روند زمانی آن‌ها نشان می‌دهد که مطالعات علوم انسانی دیجیتال در کتابخانه‌ها مسیر تدریجی زیر را طی کرده‌اند: تمرکز بر زیرساخت‌های اطلاعاتی و کاربری فناوری (۲۰۱۰–۲۰۱۳)، حرکت به‌سوی دیجیتال‌سازی و ایجاد مجموعه‌های دیجیتال (۲۰۱۳–۲۰۱۶)، تمرکز بر سازمان‌دهی دانش، وب معنایی و میراث فرهنگی (۲۰۱۶–۲۰۲۰)، و در نهایت، نوآوری‌های مبتنی بر کلان‌داده، یادگیری ماشین و هوش مصنوعی (از ۲۰۲۰ به بعد). شبکه هم‌رخدادی واژگان نیز چهار خوشه اصلی را نشان می‌دهد: پیوند مستقیم علوم انسانی دیجیتال و کتابخانه‌ها، بنیان‌های علوم انسانی، وب معنایی و میراث فرهنگی، و منابع دیجیتال و پروژه‌های عملی. تحلیل نقشه مضامین در بازه‌های زمانی مختلف بیانگر آن است که موضوعات از مرحله نوظهوری و محدودیت، به‌تدریج وارد فاز بلوغ و تخصصی‌شدن شده‌اند. به‌ویژه در سال‌های اخیر، توجه به ابعاد آموزشی و اجتماعی علوم انسانی دیجیتال نیز پررنگ‌تر گردیده است. این روند نشان می‌دهد که کتابخانه‌ها از نقش سنتی خود به‌عنوان مخزن داده عبور کرده و در حال تبدیل‌شدن به بستری پویا برای تولید دانش، حمایت از پژوهش‌های میان‌رشته‌ای و بهره‌گیری از فناوری‌های هوشمند هستند. یافته‌های این پژوهش با ارائه تصویری جامع از پیوند علوم انسانی دیجیتال و کتابخانه‌ها، می‌تواند به آینده‌ کتابخانه‌ها و سیاست‌گذاری در این حوزه یاری رساند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

Alex, B., Grover, C., Oberlander, J., Thomson, T., Anderson, M., Loxley, J., Hinrichs, U., & Zhou, K. (2017). Palimpsest: Improving assisted curation of loco-specific literature. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_1),  i4–i16.
Andrade, L. M. de. (n.d.). Digital humanities in Brazilian Information Science: a scientific production analysis. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência Da Informação; Vol 13 No 1 (2020): Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência Da Informação; 439-451, 24(2), 439–451.
Arnold, T., Leonard, P., & Tilton, L. (2017). Knowledge creation through recommender systems. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_2), ii151–ii157.
Bartalesi, V., Pratelli, N., & Lenzi, E. (2022). Linking different scientific digital libraries in Digital Humanities: the IMAGO case study. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 23(4), 303–317.
Barzen, J., & Leymann, F. (2020). Quantum humanities: a vision for quantum computing in digital humanities. SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems, 35, 153–158.
Black, M. L. (2016). The World Wide Web as Complex Data Set: Expanding the Digital Humanities into the Twentieth Century and Beyond through Internet Research. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 10(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2016.0162
Bod, R. (2013). Who’s afraid of Patterns?: The Particular versus the Universal and the Meaning of Humanities 3.0. BMGN-Low Countries Historical Review, 128(4), 171–180.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Transversal posthumanities. Philosophy Today, 63(4), 1181–1195.
Brügger, N., & Finnemann, N. O. (2013). The web and digital humanities: Theoretical and methodological concerns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 66–80.
Bullard, P. (2013). Digital Humanities and Electronic Resources in the Long Eighteenth Century. Literature Compass, 10(10), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12085
Buzzetti, D. (2019). The Origins of Humanities Computing and the Digital Humanities Turn. Humanist Studies & the Digital Age, 6(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/hsda.6.1.3
Champion, E. M. (2017). Digital humanities is text heavy, visualization light, and simulation poor. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_1), i25–i32.
Ciula, A., & Eide, Ø. (2017). Modelling in digital humanities: Signs in context. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_1), i33–i46.
Clini, P., & Quattrini, R. (2020). Digital humanities and Commons: guidelines and recflections for a possible salvation. CAPITALE CULTURALE-STUDIES ON THE VALUE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 157–175.
Clivaz, C. (2017). LOST IN TRANSLATION? THE ODYSSEY OF ‘DIGITAL HUMANITIES’IN FRENCH. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai-Digitalia, 62(1), 26–41.
Currier, B. D., Mirza, R., & Downing, J. (2020). They think all of this is new: Leveraging librarians᾿ project management skills for the digital humanities. In The Digital Humanities (pp. 137–155). Routledge.
Dalbello, M. (2011). A genealogy of digital humanities. Journal of Documentation, 67(3), 480–506.
D’Ignazio, C., & Bhargava, R. (2018). Creative data literacy: A constructionist approach to teaching information visualization.
Edwards, C. (2015). The Digital Humanities and its Users. Debates in the Digital Humanities, 40(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0021
Fenlon, K., Senseney, M., Bonn, M., & Swatscheno, J. (2019). Humanities scholars and library-based digital publishing: new forms of publication, new audiences, new publishing roles. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 50(3), 159–182.
Gleason, D. W. (2020). The humanities meet STEM: Five approaches for humanists. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19(2), 186–206.
Groes, S. (2017). Information overload in literature. Textual Practice, 31(7), 1481–1508.
Hao, G., & Fred, Y. Y. (2020). A Probe into Patentometrics in Digital Humanities. Library Trends, 69(1), 308–318.
Harvell, J., & Ball, J. (2017). Why we need to find time for digital humanities: presenting a new partnership model at the University of Sussex. Insights, 30(3).
Hawkins, A. (2022). Archives, linked data and the digital humanities: increasing access to digitised and born-digital archives via the semantic web. Archival Science, 22(3), 319–344.
Hoeve, C. D. (2018). Finding a place for genealogy and family history in the digital humanities. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(3), 215–226.
Hyvönen, E. (2020). Using the Semantic Web in digital humanities: Shift from data publishing to data-analysis and serendipitous knowledge discovery. Semantic Web, 11(1), 187–193.
Jannidis, F. (2018). Modeling in the Digital Humanities: a Research Program? Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. Supplement, 31, 96–100.
Juola, P. (2007). Killer Applications in Digital Humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm042
Karlsen, H. (2023). Foucault’s archeological discourse analysis with digital methodology—Discourse on women prior to the first wave women’s movement. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(1), 195–208.
Kennedy, K. (2017). A long-belated welcome: accepting digital humanities methods into non-DH classrooms. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(3).
Koltay, T. (2016). Library and information science and the digital humanities: perceived and real strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 781–792.
Kong, N. N., Bynum, C., Johnson, C., Sdunzik, J., & Qin, X. (2020). Spatial information literacy for digital humanities: The case study of leveraging geospatial information for African American history education. In The Digital Humanities (pp. 243–258). Routledge.
Kretzschmar, W. A., & Gray Potter, W. (2010). Library collaboration with large digital humanities projects. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(4), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq022
Langmead, A., Otis, J. M., Warren, C. N., Weingart, S. B., & Zilinksi, L. D. (2016). Towards interoperable network ontologies for the digital humanities. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 10(1), 22–35.
Laschinger, V. (2011). Digital humanities in developed and emerging markets. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(3), 21.
Mahony, S. (2018). Cultural diversity and the digital humanities. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 371–388.
Mi, X., Bernardy, R., & Schmidt, L. (2021). Building an archaeological data repository: a digital library and digital humanities collaboration at the University of South Florida. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 22(1), 135–145.
Mills, T. E. (2020). Building a Pedagogical Relationship between Philosophy and Digital Humanities through a Creative Arts Paradigm. Teaching Philosophy, 43(4), 403–429.
Morgan, P. C. (2018). The consequences of framing digital humanities tools as easy to use. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 25(3), 211–231.
Mourer, M. (2017). A subject librarian’s pedagogical path in the digital humanities. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2–4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336506
Münster, S., & Terras, M. (2020). The visual side of digital humanities: a survey on topics, researchers, and epistemic cultures. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 35(2), 366–389.
Nyhan, J., & Flinn, A. (2016). Computation and the humanities: towards an oral history of digital humanities. Springer Nature.
Nyhan, J., Flinn, A., & Welsh, A. (2015). Oral History and the Hidden Histories project: towards histories of computing in the humanities. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30(1), 71–85.
Pacheco, A. (2022). Digital humanities or humanities in digital: revisiting scholarly primitives. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(4), 1128–1140.
PASSARELLI, B., & GOMES, A. C. F. (n.d.). Transliteracies: The Third Information Wave in Digital Humanities. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência Da Informação; Vol 13 No 1 (2020): Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência Da Informação; 253-275, 24(2), 253–275.
Pawlicka, U. (2017). Data, collaboration, laboratory: Bringing concepts from science into humanities practice. English Studies, 98(5), 526–541.
Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2022). Infrastructuring digital humanities: On relational infrastructure and global reconfiguration of the field. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(2), 534–550.
Pirrone, M., Centorrino, M., Galletta, A., Sicari, C., & Villari, M. (2023). Digital Humanities and disability: A systematic literature review of cultural accessibility for people with disability. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(1), 313–329.
Poole, A. H. (2017). The conceptual ecology of digital humanities. Journal of Documentation, 73(1), 91–122.
Pun, R. (2015). Conceptualizing the integration of digital humanities in instructional services: Possibilities to enhance digital literacy in the 21st century. Library Hi Tech, 33(1), 134–142.
Rebora, S., Boot, P., Pianzola, F., Gasser, B., Herrmann, J. B., Kraxenberger, M., Kuijpers, M. M., Lauer, G., Lendvai, P., & Messerli, T. C. (2021). Digital humanities and digital social reading. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(Supplement_2), ii230–ii250.
Roth, C. (2019). Digital, digitized, and numerical humanities. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(3), 616–632.
Sabharwal, A. (2022). Digital Humanities and the Emerging Framework for Digital Curation. Digital Humanities Research, 2(2), 57.
Schofield, T., Whitelaw, M., & Kirk, D. (2017). Research through design and digital humanities in practice: What, how and who in an archive research project. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(suppl_1), i103–i120.
Schueller, D., & Mittelberg, I. (2017). Motion-Capture-assisted Gesture Research. The Relevance of Notation Theory in the Digital Humanities. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SEMIOTIK, 39(1–2), 109–146.
Shadoan, R., & Weaver, C. (2013). Visual analysis of higher-order conjunctive relationships in multidimensional data using a hypergraph query system. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2070–2079.
Soares, K. T. (2022). Ciência de Dados Sociais: uma visão sociológica das Humanidades Digitais. Simbiótica Revista Eletrônica, 8(4), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.47456/simbitica.v8i4.37346
Su, F., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Research output, intellectual structures and contributors of digital humanities research: a longitudinal analysis 2005–2020. Journal of Documentation, 78(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2020-0199
Sula, C. A., & Hill, H. V. (2019). The early history of digital humanities: An analysis of Computers and the Humanities (1966–2004) and Literary and Linguistic Computing (1986–2004). Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(Supplement_1), i190–i206.
Toon, E. (2019). The tool and the job: Digital humanities methods and the future of the history of the human sciences. History of the Human Sciences, 32(1), 83–98.
Toscano, M., Cobo, M. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Software solutions for web information systems in digital humanities: review, analysis and comparative study. Profesional de La Información, 31(2).
Vierthaler, P. (2020). Digital humanities and East Asian studies in 2020. History Compass, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12628
Wang, N. (2019). The Rise of Posthumanism: Challenge to and Prospect for Mankind. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 1–13.
Wong, S. H. R. (2016). Digital Humanities: What Can Libraries Offer? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(4), 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0046
Zeng, M. L. (2017). Smart data for digital humanities. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 1–12.
Zeng, M. L. (2019). Semantic enrichment for enhancing LAM data and supporting digital humanities. Review article. El Profesional de La Información, 28(1).
Zhao, X., Shu’ning, L., Ya’nan, X., & Huang, H. (2020). Digital Humanities Scholarly Commons at Beijing Normal University Library. Library Trends, 69(1), 250–268.
Zhuravleva, E. Y. (2011). Modern models of developments of humanitarian sciences in the digital environment. VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 5, 91–98.